Hi guys,
our company is currently evaluating Review Assistant, we using 'Simple review workflow' in our project.
The issue is there is no way to create review without assigning a reviewer to it. This doesn't allow us to use agile process, when anyone who is available can join a review.
Is there any way to create review in current version? (1.2.35 08-Aug-2013)
Or do you plan to add this ability in the nearest time?
Thanks in advance
Simple review workflow
Re: Simple review workflow
Hello,
Unfortunately, Review Assistant does not have such functionality yet. As a workaround you can grant Project Owner permissions to all users, create user (e.g. EmptyUser) and put this fake user to all newly created review. User with Project Owner permissions can add yourself as the reviewer and delete an EmptyUser.
In the upcoming Review Assistant 2.0 version we will think how to solve the problem in a more elegant way.
Unfortunately, Review Assistant does not have such functionality yet. As a workaround you can grant Project Owner permissions to all users, create user (e.g. EmptyUser) and put this fake user to all newly created review. User with Project Owner permissions can add yourself as the reviewer and delete an EmptyUser.
In the upcoming Review Assistant 2.0 version we will think how to solve the problem in a more elegant way.
Re: Simple review workflow
Alexey,
Thank you for quick response, this is solve our issue.
Thank you for quick response, this is solve our issue.
Re: Simple review workflow
Hello, I am also interested in having reviews open to the team rather than assigning someone up front. I'm currently evaluating version 2.5 and don't see a way to do this. Has this been addressed yet?
Thank you.
Thank you.
Re: Simple review workflow
Hello, please see workaround at the link below: http://blog.devart.com/agile-code-revie ... stant.htmlnlargent wrote:Hello, I am also interested in having reviews open to the team rather than assigning someone up front. I'm currently evaluating version 2.5 and don't see a way to do this. Has this been addressed yet?
Thank you.