Please do consider... your tool is what bridges these large models to the EF Core.
And this is a small one
Search found 7 matches
- Sat 08 Oct 2022 19:03
- Forum: Entity Developer
- Topic: save as diffrent framework model?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 23920
- Sat 08 Oct 2022 07:50
- Forum: Entity Developer
- Topic: save as diffrent framework model?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 23920
Re: save as diffrent framework model?
We have Telerik Models that are 300-600 tables large with associations that are multiples of those numbers. The broad strokes of Tables/Columns, along with the Associations that are never put into the database, make the associations unable to convert.
Can you not provide a "Save As" to bring these associations across to other framework models?
The time savings and use would be worth the upgrade alone for us.
Can you please consider this?
Can you not provide a "Save As" to bring these associations across to other framework models?
The time savings and use would be worth the upgrade alone for us.
Can you please consider this?
- Tue 02 Apr 2019 01:25
- Forum: Entity Developer
- Topic: Merging metasource for Telerik doesn't build object
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1785
Re: Merging metasource for Telerik doesn't build object
Did you also get my question about the foreign keys and .NET Core EF? I sent to support haven't heard back - it is also a blocking issue for me.
- Mon 25 Mar 2019 19:34
- Forum: Entity Developer
- Topic: Merging metasource for Telerik doesn't build object
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1785
Merging metasource for Telerik doesn't build object
I am a long time user of Telelrik and am grateful that you offer the import and support. I have though found an issue on one of the advanced features I used to use in Telerik which doesn't work. I use the Metadatasource to update my models dynamically in code rather than pushing in from your entity developer because when using containers, I need to distribute my app and have it handle the schema changes dynamically. Telerik excelled in this compared to the other platforms imo, and I accomplished it by like below:
then I would check and either get the changes or create the database, which works wonderfully.
When I replace the rlinq with the daml, it won't work. I really wish you would offer an export in compliance with the rlinq format for this reason specifically. It is greatly needed especially in scaling containers for unique client installations.
D.
Code: Select all
MetadataSource customdataSource = Telerik.OpenAccess.Metadata.XmlMetadataSource.FromAssemblyResource("mymodel.rlinq");
Code: Select all
string script = null;
try
{
script = handler.CreateUpdateDDLScript(null);
}
catch
{
try
{
if (handler.CreateDatabase())
script = handler.CreateDDLScript();
else
return false;
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
throw ex;
}
}
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(script) == false)
handler.ForceExecuteDDLScript(script);
D.
- Mon 25 Mar 2019 19:24
- Forum: Entity Developer
- Topic: Entity Developer and Visual Studio 2017
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3700
Re: Entity Developer and Visual Studio 2017
Thank you!
- Thu 21 Mar 2019 23:41
- Forum: Entity Developer
- Topic: Entity Developer and Visual Studio 2017
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3700
Re: Entity Developer and Visual Studio 2017
is this still the case? Odd the IDE cannot view the editor in the tool
- Mon 18 Mar 2019 00:41
- Forum: Entity Developer
- Topic: Migrate from NHibernate to EF
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2411
Re: Migrate from NHibernate to EF
Does this apply to all migrations between supported platforms?